Is Destiny Immutable?
Victor Frankenstein was a man firmly rooted in the concept of destiny and believed that destiny controls your life. However, based on his actions, decisions, and thirst for knowledge, he has proved that his destiny was not predetermined, but rather a product of his own actions.
Victor Frankenstein’s actions show that destiny is nonexistent in the form it takes with him thinking and believing that it controlled his life. Frankenstein says in his narrative, “Winter, spring, and summer passed away during my labours; but I did not watch the blossom or the expanding leaves—sights which before had yielded me supreme delight—so deeply was I engrossed in my occupation”. It is obvious that watching the blossoms would have been a much better way for Frankenstein to spend his time, but he chose instead to work on his creation—which was his own action; destiny did not control that action—he did. So thus it proves that Victor Frankenstein had free will (destiny was not in control), and he was a contradiction to the very institution he believed so firmly in.
On another note, Victor’s decisions all so show that destiny, in his definition, was without foundation. The same quoted used above, demonstrates this point as well. Frankenstein could have watched the blossoms, and taken part in this delightful activity, but he decided to instead work on his creation, proving his very beliefs to be, in his definition, false. The above quote also demonstrates that Frankenstein’s decisions were a capital reason that destiny either changes constantly or doesn’t exist.
Frankenstein’s thirst for knowledge is the key reason that destiny is alterable. In his narrative, Frankenstein says, “No one can conceive the variety of feelings which bore me onward like a hurricane, in the first enthusiasm of success. Life and death appeared to me ideal bounds, which I should first break through, and pour a torrent of light into our dark world”. This quote...