Welcome

Anti Essays offers essay examples to help students with their essay writing.

Sign Up

Assess This Argument: ‘Killing Is Wrong If and Only If It Deprives a Person of a Valuable Future Life; Some Terminally Ill People Do Not Have a Valuable Future Life; so It Is Not Wrong to Kill Them’. Essay

  • Submitted by: office9
  • on February 28, 2014
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • Length: 1,534 words

Open Document

Below is an essay on "Assess This Argument: ‘Killing Is Wrong If and Only If It Deprives a Person of a Valuable Future Life; Some Terminally Ill People Do Not Have a Valuable Future Life; so It Is Not Wrong to Kill Them’." from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples.

Assess this argument: ‘Killing is wrong if and only if it deprives a person of a valuable future life; some terminally ill people do not have a valuable future life; so it is not wrong to kill them’.

    Voluntary euthanasia is the ending of human life and intentionally relieving pain that a patient is suffering due to a terminal illness such as cancer. By definition, diseases such as cancer, cannot be cured or sufficiently treated and are expected to result in the death of the patient within the near future. As they no longer see the remaining months left of their life valuable, ending their life now seems a rational request. Killing is a form of active euthanasia whereby a person is deliberately causing death of a patient. As humans, all patients have the right to make moral decisions with regards to their own life. The argument for personal autonomy provides a stance suggesting that if a patient requests to end their life, within reason, they should be allowed to. However, it can be seen that this completely undermines the sanctity of life. Allowing a human life to intentionally be ended disregards the sacredness of human life and has no direct difference to murder despite the intentions to prevent pain. Furthermore, euthanasia would become the first step of a slippery slope whereby value of human life will be depreciated and reduced to economical and personal convenience. However, these farfetched consequences cannot surpass the empathetic argument of mercy on the patient whereby quality of life overrides quantity.
    The most convincing argument that renders the killing of terminally ill morally permissible is the understanding that all humans possess autonomy. John Stuart Mill argues in (On Liberty (1859), ‘The only part of the conduct of anyone, for which a citizen is amenable to society, is that which concerns others. In the part which it merely concerns himself, his independence is, of right, absolute. Over himself, over his own body and mind, the...

Show More


Citations

MLA Citation

"Assess This Argument: ‘Killing Is Wrong If and Only If It Deprives a Person of a Valuable Future Life; Some Terminally Ill People Do Not Have a Valuable Future Life; so It Is Not Wrong to Kill Them’.". Anti Essays. 10 Dec. 2018

<http://parimatchstavki7.com/free-essays/Assess-This-Argument-Killing-Is-Wrong-587646.html>

APA Citation

Assess This Argument: ‘Killing Is Wrong If and Only If It Deprives a Person of a Valuable Future Life; Some Terminally Ill People Do Not Have a Valuable Future Life; so It Is Not Wrong to Kill Them’.. Anti Essays. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from the World Wide Web: http://parimatchstavki7.com/free-essays/Assess-This-Argument-Killing-Is-Wrong-587646.html